The training needs of not-for-profit organisations are often identical to their corporate counterparts: onboarding, compliance, skills development, continuing professional development. The budgets, however, are not.
Enterprise LMS platforms routinely cost £50,000 to £200,000 per year. For organisations where every pound goes toward mission delivery, these figures are simply not realistic. Yet the pressure to deliver professional, measurable training continues to grow.
This article examines how not-for-profits, trade associations, and membership bodies are delivering enterprise-quality training at a fraction of enterprise costs — and what to look for when choosing an affordable LMS solution.
Key Takeaways
- The Hidden Costs of 'Enterprise' LMS Platforms
- What Not-for-Profits Actually Need
- Case Study: The Hub Plus — Healthcare Training That Scales
- Case Study: BAMA — Trade Association Knowledge Hub
The Hidden Costs of 'Enterprise' LMS Platforms
Before exploring affordable alternatives, it's worth understanding why enterprise platforms cost so much:
Licensing models designed for large corporations Enterprise LMS vendors price based on what corporations will pay, not what the market needs. Their sales processes, support structures, and feature sets assume large IT teams and substantial budgets.
Features you'll never use Enterprise platforms include extensive customisation, complex integrations, and advanced features that most organisations never touch. You're paying for capabilities designed for global corporations with thousands of employees.
Implementation costs Beyond licensing, enterprise platforms often require extensive implementation projects — consultants, custom development, data migration, training for administrators. Implementation can match or exceed first-year licensing costs.
Ongoing costs Custom development requires ongoing maintenance. Integrations need updating. Specialist administrators need training. The total cost of ownership extends far beyond the licence fee.
For a not-for-profit with a few thousand members or learners, this model makes no sense.
What Not-for-Profits Actually Need
Working with organisations across healthcare, education, and membership sectors, we've identified the features that actually matter:
Core learning delivery - Course creation and hosting - Video support (upload and embed) - Quizzes and assessments - Completion certificates - Progress tracking
Member/learner management - User registration and profiles - Group management - Enrollment tracking - Basic reporting
Communication - Email notifications - Reminders for incomplete courses - Event announcements
Live training support - Video conferencing integration - Attendance tracking - Recording storage
Administration - Simple course building (no developers needed) - Reporting for stakeholders - User import/export
Notice what's missing: complex integrations with HR systems, advanced analytics with AI predictions, white-labelling for multiple brands, marketplace functionality. Most not-for-profits don't need these — yet enterprise platforms bundle them into the price.
Case Study: The Hub Plus — Healthcare Training That Scales
The Hub Plus supports Primary Care workforce development across Derby and Derbyshire. As a not-for-profit, budget efficiency is essential.
Their requirements: - Webinars, live sessions, and on-demand training - Stakeholder reporting on engagement and completion - Group and individual user management - Waiting list handling for high-demand courses - Automated certification
The approach: Rather than an enterprise LMS, The Hub Plus chose a purpose-built platform designed for organisations like theirs. The result:
- Year-on-year growth in active users
- Improved visibility into training performance
- Simplified administration
- Strong adoption by both learners and administrators
- Scalable delivery without scalable costs
Key lesson: The platform remains affordable because it's designed for not-for-profit needs, not retrofitted from enterprise software.
Case Study: BAMA — Trade Association Knowledge Hub
BAMA (British Aerosol Manufacturers' Association) needed training infrastructure but lacked the budget for enterprise solutions.
Their requirements: - Structured Level 1 and Level 2 training programmes - Video-based and interactive content - Self-paced learning for geographically dispersed members - Progress tracking and certification - A platform that could grow beyond just training
The approach: BAMA implemented an LMS with per-user pricing — paying only for active learners rather than a large flat fee. The platform now supports:
- Introductory video courses with certificates
- Skills-based advanced courses
- 3D animated content for complex concepts
- Newsletters and fact sheets
- Compliance documentation
Key lesson: Per-user pricing aligns costs with actual usage. As membership grows, training capacity grows proportionally — without renegotiating enterprise contracts.
Pricing Models That Work for Non-Profits
The pricing model matters as much as the price itself:
Per-user pricing Pay for active learners, not potential learners. This model scales naturally with your organisation and avoids paying for inactive accounts.
Tiered pricing Predictable costs at different user thresholds. You know what you'll pay as you grow.
Included hosting and storage Avoid separate charges for video hosting, file storage, or bandwidth. These hidden costs add up quickly.
No implementation fees Modern platforms shouldn't require extensive implementation projects. If a vendor quotes implementation costs matching the annual licence, question whether the platform is appropriate for your scale.
Flexible contracts Annual commitments are reasonable; multi-year lock-ins with large upfront payments are not. Your needs will evolve.
What to avoid: - Per-course pricing (punishes organisations for creating more content) - Bandwidth charges (unpredictable costs when training succeeds) - Mandatory training packages (paying for 'expertise' to use an intuitive tool) - Long-term contracts with steep exit penalties
Making the Business Case: ROI for Budget-Conscious Organisations
Even affordable solutions require justification. Here's how to frame the value:
Direct cost savings - Reduced travel for in-person training - Eliminated venue and catering costs - Decreased reliance on external trainers for routine content - Staff time saved on manual administration
Indirect value - Consistent training quality across all learners - Documented compliance and certification - Improved member/stakeholder reporting - Scalable capacity without proportional cost increases
Risk reduction - Reduced compliance risk through tracked training - Documented training records for regulatory purposes - Consistent messaging across the organisation
Member value - Professional training as a membership benefit - Accessible learning regardless of location - Continuous development opportunities
For membership organisations, training can become a retention tool and recruitment differentiator — benefits that extend beyond direct cost calculations.
Practical Evaluation: Questions to Ask Vendors
When evaluating affordable LMS options, ask directly:
Pricing clarity - "What is the total annual cost for [X] users?" - "What's included — hosting, storage, support, updates?" - "How does pricing change as we grow?" - "Are there any setup or implementation fees?"
Capability fit - "Can non-technical staff create courses independently?" - "How does live training integration work?" - "What reporting can we provide to stakeholders?" - "How do certificates work?"
References - "Can you connect us with similar organisations using the platform?" - "Do you have case studies from the non-profit sector?"
Contract terms - "What's the minimum commitment period?" - "What happens if we need to exit the contract?" - "How do you handle pricing changes at renewal?"
Vendors serving the not-for-profit sector should answer these questions clearly. Evasiveness suggests a pricing model designed for a different market.
Starting Small, Scaling Sensibly
A practical adoption approach for budget-conscious organisations:
Phase 1: Pilot (1-2 months) - Start with a limited user group - Create 2-3 initial courses - Test the full workflow: creation, enrollment, delivery, reporting - Gather feedback from learners and administrators
Phase 2: Expand (3-6 months) - Broader rollout to membership - Additional course development - Introduce live training if applicable - Establish regular reporting rhythms
Phase 3: Optimise (ongoing) - Refine based on usage data - Expand content library - Explore additional features as needs evolve - Document best practices
This approach limits risk, builds internal capability, and demonstrates value before full commitment.
Conclusion
Not-for-profit organisations shouldn't accept the false choice between unaffordable enterprise platforms and inadequate free tools. A middle ground exists: purpose-built platforms designed for organisations where budget efficiency and mission alignment matter.
The organisations succeeding in this space share common characteristics. They choose platforms built for their scale. They prioritise core functionality over impressive feature lists. They select pricing models aligned with their reality. And they focus on delivering value to learners rather than impressing stakeholders with technology.
The goal isn't the cheapest possible solution — it's the right solution at a sustainable cost. When training infrastructure aligns with organisational resources, it becomes a foundation for growth rather than a budget burden.
For not-for-profits, trade associations, and membership bodies, this alignment is not just preferable — it's essential. Your mission depends on it.
Found this useful? Share it with your network
Ready to transform your training?
See how Continuum Learn helps organisations deliver impactful learning experiences at scale.